Category Archives: Hardware Design

SpeedZone get DataPlex Scoreboard Display Electronics

In less than three months, DataPlex designed and manufactured replacement scoreboard display tower electronics for the SpeedZone racetracks as the original manufacturer went out of business and SpeedZone needed working electronics for its karting and Grand Prix scale model Formula One racecar venues. The modest-size scoreboard controller is responsible for displaying all the lap times of each vehicle going around a racetrack on the 10,000 LED display. The displays automatically dim in the evening and on cloudy days to conserve power and be at an appropriate brightness to viewers.

DataPlex’s has been supplying custom electronics and amusement park venue control systems to the SpeedZone locations since 1997. Please read the DataPlex Case Study for more information.

SpeedZone, also known as Malibu Grand Prix and Malibu SpeedZone are the names of a group of motorsports-themed family entertainment centers throughout the United States and is owned by American amusement and entertainment company Palace Entertainment. Palace Entertainment is itself owned by Spanish amusement company Parques Reunidos.

Android-based Smartphones – Google’s Nexus One and Motorola’s Droid

Will Motorola’s Droid or Google’s Nexus One trump Apple’s iPhone?

The latest entries into the mobile computing market are the Motorola’s Droid and Google’s Nexus One, both based on Google’s powerful new Android 2.0 Operating System. Some reviewers have called these smartphones “iPhone killers.” Are they really? What does Android represent to mobile computing?

The Droid and Nexus One are both very capable devices, and they outperform the iPhone in several ways. Some if not most of their specifications indeed surpass those of the iPhone 3GS, Apple’s most recent offering, which, by the way, isn’t terribly surprising for two-year newer smartphone designs.

The Android devices tout a larger screen size, the ability to replace batteries, better voice control, application multitasking, turn-by-turn navigation like a standalone GPS device, and a less restrictive app marketplace. The iPhone has much more and better managed memory, seamless integration with its iTunes and app stores, a more protective app marketplace, a more fluid gesture-based interface, and a greater variety of more polished apps.

At DataPlex, we think of Android 2.o devices as different animals, less as direct competition for the iPhone and more as a gap-filler, particular for Verizon, the cellphone carrier that desperately needed a smartphone facelift. Many people will select Verizon smartphones because of their high-quality 3G network which is arguable better than that of AT&T, the iPhone’s exclusive carrier. Others will cite the lack of availability of add-on apps for the Android devices as compared to the enormous quantity and variety of apps available for the iPhone.

We see the Droid and Nexus One dropping into the space between the uber-business-focused Blackberry and the sleek, arty iPhone, and some new apps will just make more sense for the Android platform than they will on those for other smartphones. Android will help make more accessible business and enterprise applications.

Don’t feel bad for Apple. Apple has never sought purely to dominate a market. Rather, it looks to make its offerings attractive and easy-to-use, particularly with the overall intent of integrating them seamlessly with the rest of its product line. Alternately, the Droid and Nexus One come across as capable, feature rich devices, but ones with some rough edges and some complexity in the veins of the longstanding PC vs. Mac debate. Apple has its followers and the attraction of its more polished market. Rumor has it that Apple will releasing its next iPhone version mid-2010, that is, after it releases its also-rumored tablet. Don’t be surprised if it incorporates some of Android’s new features.

To learn more about the differences between the Droid, Nexus One and the iPhone, read the following posts. As you mull over what they say, you’ll identify with what is important to you.

The Wall Street Journal’s Walt Mossberg on his first impressions of Google’s Nexus One as compared to the iPhone:

http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20100105/googles-nexus-one-is-bold-new-face-in-super-smartphones/

GoGrid’s Technology Evangelist Michael Sheenan reports on a week he spent with the Droid:

http://www.hightechdad.com/2009/11/20/a-week-with-the-verizonmotorola-droid-by-an-iphone-addict/

Here, Technologist and TV Journalist Shelly Palmer provides a clear report card comparison of the iPhone, Droid and RIM Blackberry:

http://www.shellypalmermedia.com/2009/11/29/my-new-verizon-droid-plus-the-iphone-blackberry-droid-report-card-and-review/

Ars Technica has posted a very complete and technical analysis of the Droid sprinkled with comparisons to the iPhone:

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/reviews/2009/12/review-of-the-motorola-droid.ars/

A bunch of pictures of the Nexus One:

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2010/01/photo-gallery-googles-nexus-one.ars

Also, don’t forget that the Droid and Nexus One are only the first swath of Android 2.0 devices rolling out over the next several months, so be sure to watch for the latest in smartphone offerings. A good site to do that is:

 http://www.phonedog.com

Should you like any advice on your smartphone selection, feel free to drop me a note. Also, if you’d like to stay on top of things electronic from my perspective, you are invited to follow me on Twitter @DataPlexCEO.

Doctor Tracking System

DataPlex engineers designed several generations of “doctor tracking systems,” systems that consist of sensors and keypads around a medical facility that are used to keep track of the location of doctors, nurses and other staff members.  Doctor tracking systems are also called “personnel tracking systems” when they are used in non-medical facilities.

The first generation system, designed for Dr. Bosley of Bosley Medical of Beverly Hills, California, used room telephones, light bars and specially designed keypads.  As doctors, nurses and staff members moved about, they would press a button to inform the system about their location so that they could be located at a moments notice.  Dr. Bosley reported an astounding simultaneous increase in staff efficiency and patient satisfactions as doctors were able to more quickly get to them and answer their calls.

Display panels in the rooms would inform a doctor as to the queue of rooms for him or her to visit so the he or she would not have to take the extra time to return to a clerical station.  Also, the display panels would beep to alert doctors to emergency, highly urgent or expiring timer situations.

Doctor Tracking System panel

The second and third generation systems leveraged infrared technology and relieved the users from having to press any keys.  Badges that the doctors wear broadcast infrared signals that are picked up by infrared receivers that had been installed in the facility’s drop ceiling.

The fourth and latest generation of the Doctor Tracking Systems uses radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags.  While originally eschewed because of their signals’ ability to penetrate walls and be picked up by sensors in other rooms, technology evolved so that this “overage” actually became an advantage and that a doctor’s location could be even more closely pinpointed.  (This proved to be lifesaving in one case when a doctor collapsed out of people’s view but by way of the tracking system was found in enough time to get medical attention.) This generation system also supports voice intercom.

These systems have IT features that allow facilities to make better and faster decisions, such as when a patient should be revisited or when to clean up a room, and have tracking integrated with their enterprise systems so that doctors’ room visits can be correlated with patient billing.  We see other potential uses of this technology to track medicine dispensing and to better improve the workflow around a medical facility.

UCLA Magazine, Premier Issue

DataPlex engineers were hired by a small, fledgling company known as “3D Systems” that had a lab curiosity that they needed to turn into a product.  DataPlex principals Harry Tarnoff, Warren Juran, Stuart Spence, Richard Harlow and David Remba all contributed to getting 3D Systems’ initial “stereolithography” products designed, built and out into the hands of customers, customers which were the first of what are now known as the “rapid prototyping” and “3D printing” markets.  Read all about it here.

As part of the design effort, it was DataPlex CEO Harry Tarnoff that, against many odds, pushed stereolithography for medical applications.  The result was the use of CAT scans to build models of human anatomy, get more accurate medical results while at the same time reducing the need for surgery. The premier issue of UCLA Magazine featured one such medical application:

UCLA Magazine, Vol. 1 No. 1
Click cover for a larger view.

The caption for the cover read as follows:

Computer generated, three-dimensional models developed by N.J. Mankovich, Ph.D., UCLA Radiology, surround Thomas Faraguna, whose fractured skull was replaced by a prosthesis designed with the aid of such tools… As example of tomorrow’s high-tech, whereby an exact duplicate of a patient’s bone is created by computer-guided laser, thus insuring an exact prothesis fit before surgery.

MRI M-20 Proof-of-Concept Complete

DataPlex has completed the proof-of-concept for Measurement Research, Inc.’s M-20 Industrial Tester electronics. The proof-of-concept included demonstrating simultaneous control of multiple axis of motion and the adaption of existing electronics to minimize new development cost. DataPlex’s next step is to firm up the production specifications, lay out a new circuit board and build some intial units for long-term testing and evaluation.

DataPlex’s Designs a 4K Image Sensor

DataPlex engineers have completed the design of a 4,096 by 2,304 pixelset image sensor for high-speed photography and digital cinematography. The new sensor boasts two major advances. First, true three-color separation is achieved by using DataPlex’s novel “pixelsets” instead of pixels, eliminating the need to subsample colors and providing billiant clarity.

Second, DataPlex has invented a unique method for incorporating field programmable gate array (FPGA) technology directly onto the sensor chip to optimize the offloading of captured image data to CPUs and storage devices. This feature eliminates the need for an image data processing circuit board, reducing cost and speeding OEM product delivery to market.

DataPlex to Develop Electronics for MRI’s M-20 Industrial Tester

DataPlex has been selected by Measurement Research, Inc. (MRI) to develop the realtime control electronics for MRI’s new M-20 Industrial Tester.  The M-20 electronics will receive sensor data and control several mechanical assemblies positionally driven by different types of motors.  DataPlex will design the custom electronics, develop the firmware and Windows application, and also manufacture the M-20 circuit boards.  DataPlex had previously developed and manufactured electronics for MRI’s M-10 and M-15 product lines of Industrial Torque Testers.

The Advantages and Pitfalls of Updating Old Electronic Designs

What is an Old Design?

By “old,” we mean systems that were designed more than a generation of technology ago. “Generations of technology” are usually indicated when the class of the components are superseded by a new one. Here are some examples:

  • Microprocessor controlled hardware replacing hard-wired circuits. (There are many advantages for doing so; the resulting design is often less expensive and more flexible.)
  • Digital analog to digital converters (ADCs) and digital to analog converters (DACs) replacing analog circuits. (Typically, a microcontroller site between ADCs and DACs to provide digital processing of the digital version of the signals.)
  • HCT Series CMOS superseding LS Series TTL for driver and interface circuits. (CMOS has faster switching, lower power and can be made smaller.)

A particular hardware circuit is comprised by different sections, and each section may be different numbers of generations old, so a weighted analysis can be used to explore trade-offs of a design upgrade.

For lack of any other measure, an electronic design can be considered old if it is more than ten years old. The electronics industry as a whole advances quickly, and few electronic components are used in the same way ten years later.

One useful question to ponder: If a qualified engineer were to design a circuit today for the same application, how would it be different? The answer helps to point us in the right direction. A new electronics design will utilize parts that are currently available and have a complete yet cost effective feature set. If the design were to be significantly different, then that is a strong argument for not perpetuating the approach of old design, although.

That said, an engineer might still choose to perpetuate an old design based on economic, compatibility and political factors. He may wish to use up existing supplies of old parts, or continue to provide products which meet with customer expectations. Something more technically modernbut significantly different may be perceived by customers as inferior or undesirable. Other technical reasons relate to support and repair and intellectual property issues.

How an Old Design is Updated – The Nine Step Process

Once the decision is made to update an old design, the update process is straightforward. Here is the general process we use at DataPlex:

Step 1
Locate or Develop a Specification of the Current Design

If it was not the first step to break inertia, this should be the easiest step. Old manuals and product datasheets are often useful references.

Step 2
Identify the Key Features of the Current Design

A bit more challenging, identifying key features requires an understanding of the products and, not only how it is used by customers, but also how is it not used. Features that are under-utilized but require significant ongoing support may need to be dropped.

Step 3
Develop a List of New Features, Ordered by Priority and Usefulness

Probably the most difficult step, choosing which features remain and what new features need to be developed has to take into account what are the expectations of the marketplace and weigh them against the up-front engineering expense, the per-unit production cost, and what alternatives provides and what competitors are doing.

Step 4
Research Components and Design Approaches

The design team researches components and explores overall design approaches that seem to optimize between cost, reliability, serviceability and an appropriate feature set. For economic and development schedule reasons, not all features will make the cut (hence the need to order them).

Step 5
Begin Design Approaches

Begin to develop in a top-down approach several different designs to see how then begin to flow. Often one design will leap ahead of the rest as a better or less expensive way. Pick it as the primary design.

Step 6
Review the Designs

Explore the designs with management and (very important) also with key customers to see how well their feature sets fit with their actual needs and requirements.

Step 7
Iterate the Design

At this point, a design team may iterate back to an earlier step should, with management and customer feedback, it become obvious that none of the design alternative sufficiently meet expectations.

Step 8
Start the Primary Design Phase

Once a design seems to be acceptable, the actual primary design phase begins. While it may feel as though the actual design work is a long time in coming, actually most of the difficult decisions have already been made, the complete function set is known, and it is just a matter of implementation. Backup designs can also be begun now or held off for a later time. Also, the design team should work with management to prepare contingency plans should something go wrong.

Step 9
Don’t be Afraid to Go Back

While the main design phase is underway, should any new information indicate that the results may not meet expectations, management should decide which earlier steps should be reviewed to make the necessary adjustments to bring the design back in line. In some occasions, an alternate design replaces the originally preferred design based on the new information. Within reason, it is much better to take some extra time to develop a product that is right for the marketplace rather than push throw with one that is known to be inferior.

When the Design is Complete

When the design is complete, we move on to prototyping and testing.

What Can Go Wrong?

Updating an old electronics design is still an electronics design process and can derail for any number of reasons. For updating a design, a design team must be sure to meet the important targets of feature set, backwards compatibility, production rates, delivery schedule and price points.

It is especially important to get one or more prototypes ready as soon as possible so that the targets can be evaluated by different groups such as management and key customers. These prototypes can also be used for showing to potential customers and demonstrating trade shows while production ramps up. At all times, be vigilant for discrepancies between the prototype and the marketplace’s expectations and acceptance and review Step 9 if necessary.

Should something go wrong — say, production doesn’t ramp up quickly enough to meet the delivery schedule – there is no need to panic. Management should have already developed contingencies such as using more expensive vendors but ones that can fill in the production schedule as necessary.

One area that is particular debilitating is so vast that is deserves its own section…

Intellectual Property Legal Issues

While we do not practice law or offer legal advice, this article would not be complete without a discussion about intellectual property, both developing it and being sure not to step on others.

If it comes to your attention that you are stepping on someone’s intellectual property, you might see what it will take to license it. If the patent assignee’s (owner) is not a direct competitor, you should find a warm reception since you will potentially be providing a new revenue stream.

Or, if you think the updated design improves on the current state-of-the-art for the product class in a novel and unobvious way, you might explore applying for a patent. We won’t tell you that patents are easy — they are not, but should you get one, you will have a government sanctioned monopoly on the invention disclosed in the patent for close to 20 years, hindering competitors and providing a cash flow from licensing.

Note Well: There are ongoing changes to both domestic and international patent law, and you need to be informed about the precise process you will have to follow. For example, as of this writing, a United States invention must have its patent filed before it is first offered for sale lest it jeopardizes its international validity.

In any case, should you feel that you are in such an industry or have a product that requires or steps on intellectual property, gather your design team and consult your patent lawyer.

What to Do if You Have an Old Design

Please consider DataPlex as your one-stop design team. Our products can be found in many different industries and chances our experience staff and proprietary design tools can get you a redesign in quick order. Also, with our being technical and having been successful in written what are now issued patents, we can help you document any new inventiveness so that you can more readily apply for intellectual property.

For more information, please visit:

Maintaining High Reliability for New Electronic Designs Intended for Harsh Environments

Volume 3, Number 2

The Issues of Harsh Environments

Designing a piece of electronic hardware such that it works reliably from the get-go is a challenge, especially if it has to work outdoors or in extreme environments where temperature, humidity, vibration and radiation are the enemies of electronics.

Unfortunately, while a growing number of new electronic designs are destined to be used outdoors, the art of designing for harsh environments is not typically part of an engineering school’s curriculum. As a result, most engineers make the erroneous assumption that designing for a harsh environment is very much like designing for hospitable one but with a greater emphasis on testing and improving the design empirically, addressing the observed failure modes. Although this approach is certainly along the recommended path, it should not be the only extra consideration; otherwise, the deployment could fail.

What is a Harsh Environment?

A quick definition of a harsh environment would be anywhere not “indoors,” although this definition is incomplete. Any condition of extremes relative to the human condition applies, so that includes temperature, humidity, atmosphere (including pressure), radiation and shock, whether indoors or not. While one can easy to see that sitting outside at the south pole with minus 50 degrees winds blowing at 80% humidity easily meets the requirement, it isn’t readily apparent to him that a handheld device that could be dropped five feet also meets the requirement.

A simple test is asking the question, “if this device were a human being (scaled up or down as appropriate) and subjected to the conditions of its environment — the highest and lowest temperatures, the amount of pressure, or amount of shock, would it be expected to survive?” A cellphone operates in a harsh environment, indoors, because it can be dropped, and the amount of force it can hit a tile floor would be terminal to an appropriately scaled human being. (It often is to the cellphone too depending on the height of the drop and the quality of its design.)

The Engineering Approach

Addressing the harsh environment begins before the design phase, in the R&D phase. Knowing that the design includes a harsh environment, an engineer sets the research parameters and, later, the product specifications accordingly. Paramount of concern to him are meeting the minimum and maximum storage and operating condition limits.

To maintain high-reliability for a new design, the engineering approach must:

  • list the extreme storage and operating conditions
  • set the design specifications accordingly
  • select components that meet the specifications and reject others
  • be mindful of circuit board physics, e.g. trace lengths, component mounting methods
  • explore conformal coating and heating and cooling elements, as appropriate
  • ensure that the fabrication drawing is consistent with the harsh environment design
  • select appropriate mounting hardware, cabling and enclosure
  • test the sensor inputs and software over the complete range of operating conditions

“Testing over the complete range of operating conditions” is easy to write, but could be very difficult in actual practice, owing to the exponential increase of possibilities over an increasing number of parameters and ranges. We have found that Monte Carlo Simulation and linear programming are two very useful aids for analyzing the effects of different parameter combinations.

Post-Design & Post-Installation

No design for harsh environment is complete without a plan for follow-up during the implementation or deployment phase. A well-designed circuit may allow additional or alternative components to allow for tweaking the final design after production. For example, in one DataPlex design, a standard delay line circuit slowed down so much in cold temperature that an alternate delay circuit was automatically switched in, and the switch point was controlled by a variable resistance that could be easily changed in the field.

Software is Affected Too

It may not be obvious at all, but software can be affected by harsh environments as well. We are thinking here less of the actual computing hardware that runs the software — that is still covered by the hardware related issues discussed above — and more of the way that the software has been designed and tested in a warm, cozy lab. Software that received sensor data such as values from analog to digital converters (ADCs) may find itself attempting to deal with extreme values that it did not encounter in the lab, and that usually leads to bugs and possible failure.

Taming Harshness

In this article, we explored the nature of harsh environments, what constitutes a quality engineering approach to design a piece of gear for those environments, and the importance of follow-up in order to make adjustments and preempt out-of-spec operation or catastrophic failures.

If you have a requirement for a harsh environment design, we invite you to consider the experience of DataPlex’s staff with difficult environmental conditions and how our refined approach to R&D and engineering can mitigate certain risks for brand-new designs. Please contact us to discuss your project.

For more information, please visit:

DataPlex Creates Wireless Buttons for NBC’s Singing Bee

Through its client CBS Electronics, DataPlex quickly created the wireless button system used for contestant tie-breaking in NBC’s hit game show, Singing Bee.  The system’s buttons transmit on independent frequencies and their receivers feed a contestant “first to respond” circuit.  For heightened reliability and security, the frequencies adjust, transmitted digital signatures are verified, and multiple receivers increase the system’s range and eliminate RF dropouts.